Addressing the gathering of Attorneys General and Justice Ministers, Ambassadors, and other high level state officials from African and Asian countries, Ankumah observed that international criminal justice has no barriers, and transcends specific countries and regions. It is as relevant for Africa as it is for Europe, the Americas, and Asia. She said criminal justice is pursued for two main reasons. The first is to give due regard to the position of the victim. Indeed, impunity is an affront to the pain and suffering of victims, and the scars they have to live with, often for the rest of their lives. The second is preventive in nature. The prospect of perpetrators being held criminally accountable could deter future commission of crimes.
Ankumah contended that criminal justice is best done at home or as close as possible to home, for greater efficiency and legitimacy. However, it is not always possible to pursue criminal justice at national levels, as states might be unable or unwilling to hold perpetrators accountable due to limited capacity or inexpediency. Such reasons are not limited to specific regions.
Ankumah further highlighted Africa's mixed position on international criminal justice. On the one hand, there has been considerable support, which can be explained by the relatively long culture of discussing human rights protection at sub-regional and regional levels; a vibrant NGO community that advocates for the protection of human rights; and a painful history of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
On the other hand, the pursuit of international criminal justice has proven to be controversial because it affects the powerful and the influential. There's also the feeling in some quarters that Europe is imposing its will on Africa. Indeed, Africa has had long historical ties with Western European countries, and in modern times, development cooperation and promotion of human rights have become part and parcel of that relationship. But there would seem to be a difference in Asia, where many countries are seeking to develop their economies through business dealings with China, which - unlike development partners in Western Europe - does not insist on compliance of international human rights norms.
Ankumah opined that it seems Asian countries tend to have stronger ties with the U.S., a not so keen supporter of the ICC, while African states have stronger ties with Western European countries known to be proponents of the ICC. Indeed, Asian countries like Japan and South Korea, with ties to Western Europe, are already strong supporters of the ICC.
Ankumah called on Asian stakeholders to build a human rights and justice culture through education and sharing of information. As in Africa, serious crimes of international concern have been committed in Asian countries, like Myanmar, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Afghanistan. Ankumah said the dialogue to universalise the Rome Statute in Asia must continue, and perhaps in the process, Asia can learn some lessons, be they positive or negative, from the African experience.